24.09.2018, 18:37
(24.09.2018, 18:07)dominikk85 schrieb: allerdings habe ich den Artikel so verstanden das er zumindest eine gute Chance sieht das es doch am Schuh liegen könnte.
Eher im gegenteil:
Zitat:As sports scientist Ross Tucker pointed out after the race, the New York Times conducted an extensive study using Strava data that concluded that the Vaporflys were more than one percent faster than the next-fastest shoe. If that is true, then that explains essentially the entire improvement on the record — Kipchoge improved Kimetto’s record by 1.07%, which would mean that Kipchoge and Kimetto were equal talents racing in unequal shoes. In fact, if you go by the NYT study, you could actually argue that Kimetto is the superior runner. The Vaporflys were one percent faster than the next-fastest shoe in the study, but they were about 2.5% faster than the adidas Adizero Adios — the shoes Kimetto ran during his world record run.
Läge es am Schuh bzw seiner Theorie, hätte wir die sub2 (etwa 1:59:45 h)