(20.03.2015, 16:01)Atanvarno schrieb: Die IAAF hat nichts besseres zu tun, als Seppelt für seine Berichterstattung ihre Anwälte auf den Hals zu hetzen

Hajo Seppelt schrieb:In regards of IAAF's public "clarification": Obviously it is necessary to quote the lawfirm Bird&Bird (representing IAAF):
Regarding allegedly 'highly confidential and private information consisting of results of athletes blood tests carried out by our client' the lawfirm wrote to me on march 9th, 2015: 'Should our client learn that you have communicated information of this nature to any third party of any kind (other than WADA or other relevant anti-doping bodies), we will be instructed to take legal action against you without further notice'.

Interesting to learn: Are IFs allowed to determine, whether a journalist shares his personal research information - and with whom? In case the IAAF has forgotten it: #nickdavies: Journalists are not promoters of your business. I hope you know that also in Monaco. :-)